Peer review rules

The peer-review process is carried out to ensure that the best scientific articles can be published in the Lantern Journal: Journal of Educational Studies. peer process review is used as an objective method to determine the excellence of an article in a scientific publication so that this process is adopted by all leading scientific journals. Our Editorial Board plays an important role in maintaining the quality standards of scientific articles published in Journal of Lanterns: Journal of Educational Studies, so with these conditions then All submitted manuscripts will be reviewed following the following procedures: described below.


Early script evaluation

One ​​of the Board Teams The editor first evaluates all manuscripts submitted to the Lentera Journal: Study Journal Education. This condition is rare, but a good quality manuscript is possible to pass the stage. Manuscripts that are rejected at this stage include a high level of authenticity lacking (see the plagiarism guide), having sufficient scientific flaws serious, having poor or non-standard grammar, or being beyond the purpose and scope (Focus and Scope) Lantern Journal: Journal of Educational Studies. Eligible manuscript manuscripts will be continued to the next step for review by Bestari Partners at least one person.

Manuscripts rejected at this stage usually will be notified within two weeks of receipt.


Peer review type

Lantern Journal: Journal Education Studies using the review. a system with a “single-blind” system where reviewers can find out the name of the author of the manuscript during the revision process, besides the identity of the author of the manuscript the author is also known by bestari partners. However, the author cannot know the name and identity of the Bestari Partner.


How Bestari Partners can be selected

Whenever possible, The selected Bestari partners will be adjusted to the topic of the manuscript that is included in the Lentera Journal: Journal of Educational Studies according to their expertise. Due to the Partner database, Our bestari is constantly being updated, so we also welcome suggestions from authors' manuscripts for our Bestari Partners despite the non-binding recommendation not always used.


Bestari Partner Report

Bestari partner requested to evaluate the script manuscript in the form of :


  1. The level of authenticity of the author's thought patterns (including the data presented in the manuscript)
  2. Is the research methodology is in accordance with the results of the data obtained, and it is easy for other authors to follow if used as a reference;
  3. Has clear result data and supports the conclusions given;
  4. Order previous research reference list (state of the art) used by the scriptwriter as reference material;
  5. Following proper writing guidelines, including in terms of plagiarism;
  6. Has the new level of novelty (novelty)


Grammar correction is not part of the peer-review process, but Bestari Partners are encouraged to suggest grammar and stylistic corrections on the manuscript script. In stages At the end of the revision, the Editorial Board has the duty to examine matters concerning governance and style, and can suggest or inform the correction process to the scriptwriter. In this case, the script can be returned to the authors for the revision or improvement of the journal.


How long will the review process take

The time required for the review script manuscript process depends on the partner's response Bestari. Journal of Lantern: Journal of Educational Studies using the average time the first round of review processes on Bestari Partners for 6 weeks, with time a maximum of 3 months. If the result reviews of Bestari Partners are contradictory or different from each other, then Bestari Partners will be searched next. In this case, when it is difficult to look for another Bestari Partner, the Editorial Board can be used as a Partner The next Bestari relies on one of the review results from Bestari Partners because it is only the policy of the Editorial Board who can accept, reject or provide information on revisions of the manuscript to the authors. The decision of the Editorial Board will be sent to the scriptwriter along with the results review of Bestari Partners. As a rule, Revised manuscripts can be resubmitted into the system for in review more directly to Bestari Partners.


Final Report

The final decision manuscript to accept or reject will be sent to the author along with the results of the Partner's review recommendations Bestari, including (if any) comments from the Editorial Board


Final Decision of the Editorial Board

Bestari partners can provide input to the Editorial Board who is responsible for decisions end to accept or reject the manuscript manuscript

This mechanism follows Guidelines from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) which can be accessed at