Imperative Speech Acts of Teachers in Learning at SD Negeri Aik Kangkung, Sekongkang District

Main Article Content

Fitria Sari
Mahsun
Burhanuddin

Abstract

This study aims to describe the meaning of imperative speech acts in the interaction of teachers and students in learning, and to describe the tendency of imperative speech acts that occur and are often used by teachers at SD Negeri Aik Kangkung Kec. Sekongkang. This type of research uses the descriptive analysis method, where the researcher analyzes the data associated with the implementation of imperative pragmatics. The data obtained such as the results of observations, observations, document analysis, field notes compiled by researchers, and the results of the data are presented in the form of narrative descriptions. From the research results obtained 1). There are five forms of imperative speech found in the teacher's Imperative speech act research in Learning at SD Negeri Aik Kangkung, Sekongkang District, both in the classroom and outside the classroom as many as five forms of speech, namely ordinary orders or orders, orders or subtle orders. , utterances of command requests, utterances of orders of invitation and hope, and utterances of prohibitions. The total amount of data found by the researcher in the imperative speech research after the data triangulation process is as many as 79 utterances consisting of 31 utterances of ordinary orders or orders, 20 utterances of subtle orders, 9 utterances of request orders, 11 utterances of invitation and wish orders, and 8 utterances of prohibition orders. . The dominant form of imperative speech used by teachers both in the classroom and outside the classroom is the usual command or order speech which is found as many as 31 utterances. 2). The most dominant form of speech acts used by teachers in learning at SD Negeri Aik Kangkung is the usual order or errand that is found in as many as 31 utterances or 39.24%

Article Details

How to Cite
Fitria Sari, Mahsun, & Burhanuddin. (2022). Imperative Speech Acts of Teachers in Learning at SD Negeri Aik Kangkung, Sekongkang District. Jurnal LENTERA: Jurnal Studi Pendidikan, 4(2), 25-50. https://doi.org/10.51518/lentera.v4i2.89
Section
Articles

References

Adil Kurnia, 2010, Definisi Analisis Beban Kerja..//html. Diakses 6 Oktober 2010.
Alwi, Hasan. 1998. Tatabahasa Buku Bahasa Indonesia Edisi Tiga . Jakarta: Balai Pustaka. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2008. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia Pusat Bahasa Edisi Keempat. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Alwi, Hasan dan Dendy Sugono. 2002..Telaah Bahasa dan Sastra. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia
Anggraini, Y., Ngudining, R., & Suryadi, S. TINDAK TUTUR MARIO TEGUH DALAM ACARA MARIO TEGUH GOLDEN WAYS DI METRO TV (Doctoral dissertation, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Bengkulu).
Anggito, Albi & Johan Setiawan. 2018. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif.
Arifin, Zainal, 2010 Evaluasi Pembelajaran Prinsip, Teknik, Prosedur, Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung.
Arikunto, S. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Ariyanti, L. D., & Zulaeha, I. (2017). Tindak tutur ekspresif humanis dalam interaksi pembelajaran di sma negeri 1 batang: Analisis wacana kelas. Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 6(2), 111-122.
Burhanuddin, B., & Sumarlam, S. (2015). Presiden Joko Widodo: Potret Tindak Tutur Penanganan Masalah Sosial-politik Bangsa. Adabiyyāt: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 14(2), 167-190.
Burhanuddin, B., & Sumarlam, S. TINDAK TUTUR IMPERATIF KHUTBAH JUMAT DALAM TABLOID SUARA MUHAMMADIYAH. PROSIDING PRASASTI, 464-469.
Fitriah, F., & Fitriani, S. S. (2017). Analisis Tindak Tutur dalam Novel Marwah di Ujung Bara Karya RH Fitriadi. Master Bahasa, 5(1), 51-62.
Hermawan, Iwan. 2019. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Mixed Methode. Kuningan: Hidayatul Qurun.
Jati Kesuma, Tri Mastoyo. 2007. Pengantar (Mrtode) Penelitian Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Carasvatibooks.
Kasim, F. (2016). The form and function of local language in directive speech act at a university in Central Sulawesi. Lingua Cultura, 10(1), 37-42.
Prihantini, Ania. 2015. Master Bahasa Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Banteng Pustaka
Rahardja dan Manurung. 2010. Teori Ekonomi Mikro (Suatu Pengantar). Jakarta: Lembaga Penerbit FEUI
Rendro. (2010). Beyond Borders : Communication Moderenity & History. Jakarta. LSPR.
Rikizaputra, R., & Sulastri, H. (2020). Pengaruh E-Learning dengan Google Classroom terhadap Hasil dan Motivasi Belajar Biologi Siswa. Lectura: Jurnal Pendidikan, 11(1), 106-118.
Rohmadi, Muhammad. 2010. Pragmatik: Teori dan Analisis. Surakarta: Yuma Pustaka
Salim & Haidir. (2019). Penelitian Pendidikan : Metode, Pendekatan, danJenis. Jakarta. Kencana
Setiyaningsih, M., & Rahmawati, L. E. (2022). Bentuk Tindak Tutur Ekspresif dalam Mini Seri “Sore: Istri dari Masa Depan” Karya Yandy Laurens. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Undiksha, 12(1), 85-98.
Steers, Richard M, Terj: Magdalena Jamin, Efektivitas Organisasi, Jakarta:Erlangga, 1980"
Sugiyono. 2013. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. 2016. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, R&D. Bandung : IKAPI
Sukirman Nurdjan, S. S., Firman, S. P., & Mirnawati, S. P. (2016). Bahasa Indonesia untuk Perguruan Tinggi. Penerbit Aksara TIMUR.
Suyono & Hariyanto. (2012). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset"
Suyono. 1990. Pragmatik Dasar- Dasar dan Pengajaran. Malang): yayasan asih asah asuh (YA 3 Malang
Tyas, M. R. N., & Sufanti, M. (2019). Bentuk, Jenis, dan Kesantunan Pragmatik Tindak Tutur Imperatif Guru Bahasa Indonesia SMP Muhammadiyah 1 Sragen (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta).
Unsiah, Frida., Yulianti, Ria. Pengantar Ilmu Linguistik. Malang: UB Press, 2018.
Wijana dan Muhammad Rohmadi. 2009. Analisis Wacana Pragmatik Kajian Teori dan Analisis. Surakarta: Yuma Pustaka.