Analysis of Geometry Problem Solving with a Metacognitive Approach in terms of the Cognitive Strategy Aspect
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aims to determine students' abilities to solve geometry problems using a metacognitive approach, looking at the cognitive strategy aspect. This type of research is qualitative with a descriptive approach. The research subjects consisted of three class IX students of Purwodadi Adventist Middle School with high, medium, and low abilities. Data collection was carried out through testing instruments, test questions, and interviews. The results of this research show that students who are highly skilled in solving geometric problems using a metacognitive approach, looking at the cognitive strategy aspect, have fulfilled the overall indicators very well. Then, students with moderate abilities, in solving geometry problems using a metacognitive approach reviewed in the cognitive strategy aspect, can fulfill all the indicators of the cognitive strategy aspect quite well. Meanwhile, students with low ability in solving geometry problems using a metacognitive approach reviewed in the cognitive strategy aspect have not been able to fulfill some of the indicators in the cognitive strategy aspect
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
As’ri, AR. 2007. Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif: Masih adakah ruang untuk inovasi. http//www.indoms.
Alfiyah, N & Siswono, T. Y. E. 2014 Identifikasi Kesulitan Metakognisi Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, vol. 3, no. 2. hlm. 131 – 138.
Anggo, M., 2011, The Metacognitive Process of Teachers College Students in Solving Mathematical Problems, Dissertation, not published, Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
Anggo, M. 2011. Pelibatan Metakognisi dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Jurnal Edumatica, 1 (1).
Depdiknas. 2003. Undang-undang RI No.20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.
De Corte, E., 2003, Intervention Research: A Tool for Bridging the Theory – Practice Gap in Mathematics Education, Proceedings of the International Conference, The Mathematics Education into the 21st Century Project, Brno Czech Republic.
Erman Suherman. 2003. Evaluasi Pembelajaran Matematika. JICA: FP MIPA UPI.
Fauziana, Anis. 2008. Identifikasi Karakteristik Metakognisi Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Hudojo, H. 2001. Pengembangan Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran Matematika. Malang: UNM.
Fitriani. (2023). The Contribution Of Islamic Religious Education Learning To Increase Understanding Of Civic Concepts In Students Of The Islamic Education Study Program STAI Al-Amin Dompu. Jurnal LENTERA: Jurnal Studi Pendidikan, 5(2), 29-38. https://doi.org/10.51518/lentera.v5i2.152
Hadari Nawawi, (2003). Metode Penelitian Bidang Sosial. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada Universitas Press.
Kramarski, B. et,al (2002). The Effects of Metacognitive Instruction on Solving Mathematical Authentic Tasks. Educational Studies in Mathematics.Vol. 49 No. 2.
Lexi J. Moleong, (2009). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosda karya.
Nurdalilah, et al. 2013. Perbedaan Kemampuan Penalaran Matematika dan Pemecahan Masalah Pada Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah dan Pembelajaran Konvensional di SMA Negeri 1 Kualuh Selatan. Jurnal pendidikan matematika/edumat, 6(2): 109-119.
Nuralam. 2009. Pemecahan Masalah Sebagai Pendekatan dalam Belajar Matematika. Jurnal Edukasi, 5(1): 142-154.
McLoughlin, C. & Hollingworth, R. 2003. Exploring a Hidden Dimension of Online Quality: Matacognitive Skill Development, 16th ODLAA Biennial Forum Conference Proceedings. http://www.signadou.acu.edu.au, diakses tanggal 16 Nop 2009.
Mustamin Anggo, et, al. (2015). Metacognitive Strategies On Mathematics Learning To Improve
Student’s Environmental Awareness. International Journal of Education and Research Vol. 3 No. 4 .
Ormrod, J. E. 2009. Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta : Erlangga.
Özcan,C.Z. 2014. Assessment of Metacognition in Mathematics: Which One of Two Methods is a Better Predictor of Mathematics Achievement?. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2014, vol. 6, no. 1, hlm. 49-57.
Rasiman. 2012. Penelusuran Proses Berpikir Kritis Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika bagi Siswa dengan Kemampuan Matematika Tinggi. e-jurnal.ikippgrismg.ac.id. 2012, Vol. 3, No. 1, IKIP PGRI Semarang.
Sugiyono. 2014. Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sumarmo Umar. 2003. Alternatif Pembelajaran Matematika dalam Menerapkan Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi. Makalah disajikan pada seminar nasional FP MIPA UPI: Tidak diterbitkan.
Yeo, Kai Kow Joseph. 2004. Mathematical Problem Solving in The Primary and Secondary Levels. Email: kaikow.yeo@nie.edu.sg.